Wikinews interviews Australian Paralympic skier Andrew Bor

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Sunday, Wikinews sat down with Australian Paralympic guide skier Andrew Bor who was participating in a national team training camp in Vail, Colorado.

((Wikinews)) This is Andrew Bor, who is Melissa Perrine’s guide skier. How did you become a guide?

Andrew Bor: I was coaching with the team, the September before the games here. And the APC [Australian Paralympic Committee] found out, I’m not sure how, sent Melissa out to New Zealand where there was a training camp. She didn’t have a guide. And one of the coaches chose me to guide Mel.

((WN)) Had you done much guiding before?

Andrew Bor: Two days. Guided a visually impaired athlete twice before that.

((WN)) Was there a steep learning curve?

Andrew Bor: Yeah, very steep learning curve. Still learning.

((WN)) Is it more difficult as a male guide with a female skier, do you think, because the rules require you to use male ski equipment?

Andrew Bor: No. No, I don’t think so. I don’t think there’s any issue with that. The skis make a different radius turn. Sometimes. No, I don’t think it makes a huge difference.

((WN)) As a guide skier, do you think that guides should be getting medals when their skier gets a medal? Are you that important?

Andrew Bor: No, I don’t know. It’s the athlete’s performance really.

((WN)) But you’re an athlete aren’t you?

Andrew Bor: No. I’m their eyes if that makes any sense. If they don’t have the commitment to go down the hill, you’re never going to get them to go fast anyway. The guide’s responsibility is to put them in the right place. But beyond that…

((WN)) You’ve gotten support because of the performance in Vancouver? The government has been supporting you guys?

Andrew Bor: The government has decided to support the guides as equally as the athletes. Before I was employed by the APC, and now I don’t get paid by the APC, I get the same support levels. Otherwise, you can’t do it, you can’t afford the time.

((WN)) Why have you chosen skiing as opposed to oh, waterskiing or some other sport?

Andrew Bor: I’ve worked in this industry for about 20 years. Teaching skiing, coaching. It’s not something I chose to do, it’s something that kind of happened. After a while a door closed, a door opened. I enjoy the environment. Working outdoors and work in some lovely places. You get some great days when there’s blue sky and sunshine and other days in Australia where it might be two degrees and raining. But it beats working in an office.

((WN)) Do you think the classification system for blind skiers works and is a good one? Especially with the factoring issues, and you’re competing with B1, B2, B3, all compete against each other.

Andrew Bor: Yeah, I don’t know. I don’t think there’s a big enough pool of athletes to have three different classes. It’s never going to be ideal. Different classes have different issues. The handicap for the twos and the threes is fairly similar across the different disciplines. Maybe the threes have an advantage in the tech because they can see a bit more, but they have a bit of a disadvantage in the speed because they can’t see enough to see the next gate and have to rely on the guide. Bit of a trade off. It’s never going to be perfect. It’s a tough one.

((WN)) Are you planning to go to Sochi with Melissa?

Andrew Bor: Yes. Yes I am.

((WN)) Do you think you guys have, you and Melissa can pick up a medal, and you get a medal?

Andrew Bor: I think Melissa is yeah. I think Melissa has a fairly good chance. You know, if things fall in place. I think she’s got an opportunity to win at least a medal. If things don’t fall in place. Yeah. She might miss out completely.

((WN)) Do you plan to continue guide skiing with Melissa for a period following Sochi, or are you going to be like “I’ve had enough, I’m getting old, these mountains are really tall, I’m going to retire?”

Andrew Bor: I don’t know. We’ll wait and see. At the moment the commitment is until Sochi. You see with athletes, some announce their retirement early. Depends what Melissa wants to do. Depends on whether you achieve the goals that she sets or not. Whether she’s got unfinished business…

((WN)) But at the moment, the goal is Sochi?

Andrew Bor: The goal is Sochi, yes. You’ve got to have an end goal, and at the moment it’s Sochi. The energy of the last four years has been put into that. There’s been a commitment for her to go to Sochi, and at the same time you’ve got to commit to the same thing. The guide-to-athlete thing is a relationship that takes time to build and work out the needs of the athlete and the wants of the athlete. Beyond Sochi, don’t know. We’ll see.
Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Wikinews_interviews_Australian_Paralympic_skier_Andrew_Bor&oldid=4567567”
Posted in Uncategorized

Time magazine refutes US President Donald Trump’s Twitter claim he was nominated Time ‘Person of the Year’

Monday, November 27, 2017

On Friday, US president Donald Trump released a tweet via Twitter claiming New York-based magazine Time had informed him they would “probably” name him “Person of the Year”. The claims made in the tweet, sent while Trump resided for the Thanksgiving season at his Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, were promptly refuted by the magazine itself and personnel connected to its publication.

Trump’s tweet read, “Time Magazine called to say that I was PROBABLY going to be named ‘Man (Person) of the Year,’ like last year, but I would have to agree to an interview and a major photo shoot. I said probably is no good and took a pass. Thanks anyway!”

Time magazine recognizes as “Person of the Year” an individual who “for better or for worse… has done the most to influence the events of the year.” The magazine named Trump in 2016 in an issue titled “President of the Divided States of America” a month after his successful bid for the U.S. presidency. Agence France-Presse noted, in 2012, 2013, and 2015 Trump used his Twitter account as a platform to highlight his displeasure at not being so named.

Time magazine released a tweet of their own on Friday refuting the claim made by Trump, which read, “The President is incorrect about how we choose Person of the Year. TIME does not comment on our choice until publication, which is December 6.”

Rather than a photo shoot such as Trump claimed they requested, Time magazine used a painting to depict German chancellor Angela Merkel for their 2015 “Person of the Year” issue, when they chose her to receive the title.

Alan Murray, the chief content officer for Time Inc., the magazine’s publisher, also countered Trump’s claim in a tweet on Friday, stating, “Amazing. Not a speck of truth here—Trump tweets he ‘took a pass’ at being named TIME’s person of the year”.

Richard Stengel, a former editor of the magazine, also weighed in on Trump’s comments in a tweet posted half an hour after Trump’s, “Hate to tell you but that PROBABLY means you’re NOT Person of the Year. They just wanted a photo shoot. But I’m sure you still have that fake TIME cover somewhere in storage.” Stengel’s tweet refers to fake Time magazine covers prominently displaying Trump’s face that were hung on the walls of golf clubs owned by the President, as reported in the Washington Post in June. The magazine requested their removal.

Since Trump entered the race for U.S. president, he has frequently called news outlets in the United States “fake news” when they release reports critical of him.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Time_magazine_refutes_US_President_Donald_Trump%27s_Twitter_claim_he_was_nominated_Time_%27Person_of_the_Year%27&oldid=4572680”
Posted in Uncategorized

Qantas ordered to check oxygen cylinders

Sunday, July 27, 2008

Australian Transport Safety Bureau announced that an oxygen cylinder which was located near the area of the explosion on Qantas flight QF30 from London, England to Melbourne, Australia was unaccounted for but said that it was too early to say that an oxygen cylinder could be the cause of the mid-air explosion. It did say it had ruled out explosives as a cause stating that they “found no indication of explosives”.

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority has ordered Qantas to check all oxygen cylinders and the brackets which hold them on its Boeing 747s, but hasn’t ruled out that the order will be extended to all of the Qantas fleet.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Qantas_ordered_to_check_oxygen_cylinders&oldid=4567649”
Posted in Uncategorized

Sam Simon, ‘The Simpsons’ co-creator, dies aged 59

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Sam Simon died, at the age of 59, on Sunday of colon cancer, a disease he was diagnosed with in 2012. One of the co-creators of the television series The Simpsons, Simon helped create the hugely successful series in 1989 alongside Matt Groening and James L. Brooks. He left the show in 1993 after roles as writer and character developer among others.

Before The Simpsons Simon had worked on several shows in various positions. During the 1980s he worked on shows such as Taxi, Cheers, and The Tracy Ullman Show. In 1989 he helped create The Simpsons with Brooks and Groening, and was responsible for hiring the show’s first writing team. Despite leaving the show in 1993 he kept the title of executive producer, and continued to receive tens of millions of dollars every season in royalties.

After his diagnosis he began to donate his fortune to charity, estimated at around US$100 million . He donated to and was an active voice for charities focusing on animal rights including PETA. The Sam Simon Foundation, an organization he founded in 2002, released a statement to TMZ after his death: “For those of us who knew him, his voice will forever echo in our minds; his sense of humor will continue to make us laugh; and his compassion and generosity will continue to impact our lives[…] Sam, you will be missed by many, but there is a particular sadness among our clinic staff. We have been together for so long, and your absence will forever leave a void in our lives.”

Speaking to NBC in November 2014, Simon said “Cancer has been a fight, a journey, an adventure and the most amazing experience of my life.”

Simon had no children and was twice divorced. His first wife was actress Jennifer Tilly, to whom he was married from 1984 until their split in 1991. He married Playboy Playmate Jami Ferrell in 2000; the pair divorced not long after.

Current executive producer of The Simpsons, Al Jean paid tribute to Simon via Twitter, tweeting “Just heard terrible news of death of @simonsam. A great man; I owe him everything.”

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Sam_Simon,_%27The_Simpsons%27_co-creator,_dies_aged_59&oldid=4272580”
Posted in Uncategorized

How Much Of The Bible Can A Person Not Believe And Still Be Okay?

Assuming there is a problem between man and God, what is the stuff that corrects the problem? Is it good works? Is it obedience to various rituals? Is it by confessing and repenting of sins?We maintain that a man is justified (made right with God) by faith … Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness (Ro 3:28 and 4:3). So, what did Abraham believe? He simply believed what (God) had promised, He was also able to perform (Ro 4:21) – even though Gods declaration defied natural law … as Sarahs womb was long dead (Gen 18:9-15 and Ro 4:19). Now, not for his sake only was it written, that (righteousness) was credited to him, but for our sake also, to whom it will be reckoned, as those who believe in Him … (Ro 4:21, 23-24). So, what must one believe so as to gain right standing before the Creator? This is quite simple. One must believe His words. While the Bible is not God (any more than our words are us), these words come from within Him and, as such, are an extension of Him. That is why unbelief repels Him. Thou hast magnified Thy word together with all Thy Name (Ps 138:2). It is easier for the heavens and earth to vanish than for a single stroke of His word to fail (Mt 5:18). Forever, O Lord, Thy word stands in heaven (Ps 119:89). The Horseman (Jesus) in Revelation is called, The Word of God (Rev 19:13). But, … this is just the beginning.God has decided to use His Word to bring us to Himself. In the exercise of His will He brought us forth by the word of truth … (Ja 1:18). (F)or you have been born again … through the living and abiding word of God (1Pet 1:23). He cleanses us by washing us with the word (Eph 5:26). It is also the tool for Christian growth. (L)ong for the pure milk of the word, in order that you may grow … (1Pet 2:2). Eventually, it is solid food … for the mature (Heb 5:13,14). Gods word is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness (2Cor 3:16). It is living and active – and is compared to a sword, a hammer and fire (Heb 4:12 and Jer 23:29). So, how much of it can one not believe – and still be okay?Our relationship to His Word determines our eternal fate.Jesus once said, whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will also be ashamed of him when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels (Mk 8:38). But, why any shame? If I believe the Bible is from our eternal Creator – who is incapable of error and never lies – whats the problem? I did not write any of it. This Book was completed almost two thousand years ago. If I decide to represent it – my job is to faithfully and accurately share its contents to interested parties. What parts could possibly make me red-faced before an adulterous and sinful generation? Well, lets start at the beginning of the Book. Is there anything there that might cause me shame?The first three chapters of Genesis detail Creation … and then the Fall. God spoke the heavens and earth into existence (initially from nothing) in six days. Then a Garden is described with the first man (naked), the first woman (naked), and a talking animal. Then a singular event of disobedience is recounted which is declared the genesis of all our troubles – troubles like pain, a harsh environment – you know, the bumps and potholes on lifes road. And this road proceeds to a cliff … over which we all plummet into death. No belief problems yet, right?Jesus and Paul referred to events in that Garden as they make arguments for marriage, divorce, death, sin, the current physical environment, and the role of women (Mt 19:4-12, Ro 5:12-19, 8:20-23, 1Tim 2:9-15). If the Creation/Fall account is symbolic, a myth, or folklore, then their points crumble. Jesus and Paul believed the Genesis account to be … historical.So, why do Systematic Theologians call belief in the historical accuracy of this account, The Naive-Literal View? Why not just, The Literal View? And from whence cometh the Age-Day theory, Progressive Creation theory, and Pictorial Day theory? Why these systems of unbelief toward historical information? Could it be … some are ashamed of a literal adherence to it? Granted, this account does defy natural law, but, come to think of it … Abrahams faith required belief against natural law, too.So, the question remains, how much of the word of God can one not believe … and still be okay? If one is red-faced over the Creation/Fall account – particularly before scientific experts of the various longevity models – well, what about other things? The Bible declares that forty days after rising from the dead, Jesus physically lifted off the ground and went into Heaven. So, … do you believe this nature defying account – but not Genesis? What about Elijah being taken up by a chariot of fire? What about Elisha and the floating iron axe head? What about the sun standing still so Joshua could kill more people? Hundreds of Biblical accounts defy natural law. Do you believe them? Or, do you believe some of them – while being red-faced about others? Here is one way to test yourself, to see if you are in the faith (2Cor 13:5). Go find a scientifically informed, atheistic evolutionist and tell him/her which miraculous Biblical accounts you do believe … and why. As they begin a belly laugh, and fall to the ground in hysterics – what do you feel inside yourself? Embarrassment? Shame?The question remains: How much can one … well, you know the rest of the question.A Couple of PointsFirst, … for any given Biblical declaration, people line up as either a believer or unbeliever. But, it is also clear that God ultimately classifies some as unbelievers – who actually do believe some of the Bible. You believe that God is one. You do well; the demons also believe, and shudder (Ja 2:19). These people (and all the demons, too) believe accurately on this point … but, are not okay. Many will say to me on (Judgment) Day, Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name … (Mt 7:21-23). These people even believe Jesus is Lord – and that they had served Him in this life! But, they are not okay. So, even an accurate faith in some of Gods word does not result in righteousness being credited to those believers. So, how much can one not believe ….Second, … there was a time I … was an unbeliever. I wholeheartedly believed in evolution – even taking college courses. Quite honestly, all this Biblical material … was totally irrelevant (I detail much of this elsewhere). So, I know what it means – to not believe. How did this change? Well, once jogged awake, I began digging, digging, digging – weighing, weighing, weighing – and asking, asking, asking. Step by step, issue by issue, objection by objection, God eventually sold me on the validity and accuracy of His claims – despite current natural law. Even now, as I reflect back on this journey, I find it stunning. There was no compelling reason God had to come down to my level, dismantle my contrary beliefs, and then open my mind – so as to unashamedly embrace, and then advocate, His assertions. But, He did so anyway. To say I am indebted to Him does not begin to grasp the reality of my former plight – and rescue.Still, at times along the way, I have struggled with some Biblical declarations. I could not make myself believe them … and I could not pretend to believe them either. But, as unbelief is a mortal threat to my eternal well being, what could I do? Fortunately, God addresses this. After The Transfiguration, Jesus was confronted by a situation the disciples could not handle. A distraught father implored Him, … if You can do anything, take pity on us and help us! Jesus responded, If You can? All things are possible to him who believes. Immediately, the boys father cried out and began saying, I do believe; help me in my unbelief (Mk 9:22-24). This man humbled himself … and the Lord responded positively.I do not know how much one can not believe of the Word of God … and still be okay. But, I do know this; one stands, or falls, based upon ones belief, or unbelief, of it. Are you sure you want to stand before the Author and tell Him the Creation Account is a myth, that axe head never floated, no hand appeared and wrote on a wall ….

Wikinews interviews Frank Moore, independent candidate for US President

Saturday, March 1, 2008

While nearly all coverage of the 2008 Presidential election has focused on the Democratic and Republican candidates, the race for the White House also includes independents and third party candidates. These parties represent a variety of views that may not be acknowledged by the major party platforms.

Wikinews has impartially reached out to these candidates, throughout the campaign. We now interview independent Presidential candidate Frank Moore, a performance artist.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Wikinews_interviews_Frank_Moore,_independent_candidate_for_US_President&oldid=2185149”
Posted in Uncategorized

US TV host Conan O’Brien rejects NBC’s offer to switch his show’s time slot

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

File:Elizabeth and John Edwards by The Tonight Show.jpg

On Tuesday, United States television personality Conan O’Brien announced in a statement that he will no longer serve as the host for NBC‘s The Tonight Show if the network’s attempt to move his program to the post-midnight time slot comes to fruition.

This move, NBC has said, would be done to accommodate the return of the previous Tonight Show host, Jay Leno, back to late-night from his current prime-time slot.

In a long statement to the media, O’Brien states that NBC has given him a “scant” seven months to establish himself as host of The Tonight Show.

He continues to say that with his show still in “its infancy, NBC has decided to react to their terrible difficulties in prime-time by making a change in their long-established late night schedule.”

O’Brien adamantly declares that “delaying The Tonight Show into the next day to accommodate another comedy program will seriously damage what I consider to be the greatest franchise in the history of broadcasting.”

Citing his view that NBC’s purposed switch of The Tonight Show time slot could lead to the show’s ultimate “destruction,” O’Brien maintains that he would have no other choice than to step down as host—which could also include his possible move to another cable network—if this does in fact happen.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=US_TV_host_Conan_O%27Brien_rejects_NBC%27s_offer_to_switch_his_show%27s_time_slot&oldid=4559356”
Posted in Uncategorized

Canada’s Don Valley West (Ward 26) city council candidates speak

This exclusive interview features first-hand journalism by a Wikinews reporter. See the collaboration page for more details.

Friday, November 3, 2006

On November 13, Torontonians will be heading to the polls to vote for their ward’s councillor and for mayor. Among Toronto’s ridings is Don Valley West (Ward 26). Four candidates responded to Wikinews’ requests for an interview. This ward’s candidates include Muhammad Alam, Bahar Aminvaziri, Orhan Aybars, Michele Carroll-Smith, Mohamed Dhanani, Abdul Ingar, Geoff Kettel, Debbie Lechter, Natalie Maniates, John Masterson, John Parker, David Thomas, Csaba Vegh, and Fred Williams.

For more information on the election, read Toronto municipal election, 2006.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Canada%27s_Don_Valley_West_(Ward_26)_city_council_candidates_speak&oldid=2584823”
Posted in Uncategorized

Choosing The Best Trade Show Exhibit

byAlma Abell

Trade shows are the place organizations go to specifically target pertinent purchasers. It is paramount to create an impression at the trade show that will outshine the charm of others. One instrument that can help you shine is a trade show display. Trade show exhibit displays offer a practical approach to sharing your message effectively.

It doesn’t matter what the goal is, a simple trade show exhibit display can accomplish practically anything. Each section of a trade show has two basic objectives: to draw in activity and to pass on a message. With every section vying for consideration, it’s hard to stand out.

These displays come in a variety of different styles, and each one has its advantages. No matter which type you decide to utilize, trade show displays require some thought to assemble a setup that will draw attention. It’s important to look at the different categories to get inspired.

Pop-up Trade Show Exhibits

The pop-up trade show presentation is a real standout among the best displays, and they are also lightweight and easy to manage. A 10-foot display can overlap into one or two cases, each with the span of a substantial golf bag. Pop-up exhibits usually weigh about 70 pounds, and are usually managed by only one individual.

These trade show exhibits are genuinely simple to tend to, but they aren’t very adaptable when it comes to size. Their casings must be completely open to stay stable, so the exhibits are not likely to fit into smaller or wider spaces.

Board Trade Show Exhibits

Board trade show displays are among the most adaptable exhibits. The display consists of separate boards organized in a distinctive pattern. This is a perfect exhibit for those located at exhibition spaces of varying shapes and sizes.

Board trade show displays can hold substantial level pictures, making them adaptable and versatile for a business’ evolving needs. Unfortunately, the displays often require more than one individual to manage. You must consider this when determining which trade show showcase to buy.

Modular Trade Show Exhibits

Measured trade show displays are especially helpful if your spatial needs are sporadic. You might be traveling from exhibition to exhibition, and you aren’t sure how big the space is going to be. In this case, you need a design that is unique to your needs.

If you need get something on a tight budget, this is an excellent choice. You can also add a modular trade show display to a custom presentation for a noteworthy exhibit, which is more affordable than purchasing a complete unit.

If you want your exhibit to stand out at the next trade show, it is imperative that you focus on your needs. You want to leave exhibition-goers with the impression that you are professional – don’t drop the ball.

English court jails policeman over insurance fraud

Thursday, July 1, 2010

A court in England, UK has jailed a policeman for ten months after he was convicted of defrauding his car insurance company.

Police Constable Simon Hood, 43, arranged for a friend who dealt in scrap metal to dispose of his Audi TT, then claimed it had been stolen.

Hood had been disappointed with the car’s value when he tried to sell it two years after its purchase in 2008. He arranged for friend Peter Marsh, 41, to drive the vehicle to his scrapyard in Great Yarmouth, Norfolk. Marsh then dismantled the vehicle with the intent of disposing of it, but parts were later found wrapped in bubblewrap at Ace Tyre and Exhaust Centre.

Marsh picked up the TT from outside nearby Gorleston police station. Records show mobile phone conversations between the conspirators that day in March, both before and after the vehicle was reported stolen. The pair denied wrongdoing but were convicted of conspiring to commit insurance fraud after trial.

The fraud was uncovered after Hood told former girlfriend Suzanne Coates of the scheme. It was alleged before Norwich Crown Court that he had confessed to her in an effort to resume their relationship. Coates said that after the pseudotheft, Hood told her “he didn’t want to look for it. He said it would be like looking for a needle in a haystack, which I thought was a bit strange.”

You knew throughout your career that policemen that get involved in serious dishonesty get sent to prison

Shortly afterwards Hood suggested they should become a couple once more, she said; she challenged his version of events regarding the car: “He said he did it but I couldn’t tell anyone. He said he did it with Peter. Peter had a key and took the car away and it was going to be taken to bits and got rid of so it was never found.”

Hood was defended by Michael Clare and Marsh by Richard Potts. Both lawyers told the court that their clients had already suffered as a result of the action in mitigation before sentencing. Clare said Hood had resigned from the police after fifteen years of otherwise good service and risked losing his pension. “It is not a case where his position as a police officer was used in order to facilitate the fraud,” he pointed out. “His career is in ruins.” Hood is now pursuing a career in plumbing.

Potts defended Marsh by saying that he, too, had already suffered from his actions. His own insurers are refusing to renew their contract with him when it expires and his bank withdrew its overdraft facility. His business employs 21 people and Potts cited Marsh’s sponsorship of Great Yarmouth In Bloom as amongst evidence he supported his local community.

Judge Alasdair Darroch told Marsh that he did accept the man was attempting to help his friend. He sentenced Marsh to six months imprisonment, suspended for two years and ordered to carry out 250 hours of community service. He was more critical of Hood:

“As a police officer you know the highest possible standards are demanded by the public. You have let down the force. You knew throughout your career that policemen that get involved in serious dishonesty get sent to prison.”

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=English_court_jails_policeman_over_insurance_fraud&oldid=4459597”
Posted in Uncategorized