America’s Love Affair With The Pickup Truck

By Darryl Walters

Baseball, apple pie, and pickup trucks – three symbols of the down-home American heartland. Americans tend to love all things American and the pickup truck is no exception. The very first pickup truck debuted, thanks to Henry Ford, in 1925. Although a bit lengthy for today’s marketing standards, Ford described it as a “Ford Model T Runabout with Pickup Body.” It was surprisingly similar to current pickups with an adjustable tailgate, a large cargo box, and heavy-duty springs in the rear.

Throughout the United States’ short history, the pickup truck gained popularity and continued to evolve. Three years later, Ford replaced the Model T with the Model A – which was the first closed-cab pickup and included new features like roll-up side windows and a safety glass windshield. Capable of a whopping 40 horsepower (impressive at the time), the Model A sported a four-cylinder engine and three-speed transmission.

By 1931, Chevrolet stepped up and offered its first pickup model in an effort to compete with Ford. But Ford wasn’t going anywhere. They countered the following year by releasing an even more powerful pickup with 65-horsepower and the Ford flathead V8 engine, a strategy that proved profitable to say the least. By 1936, there were three million Ford trucks on the road and the pickup led the industry in sales.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_JGffRNRoc[/youtube]

When the Great Depression hit, farmers needed to scale back and could no longer afford a truck for their farms and a car for their families. Thus, the need for a passenger-ready pickup was born and an Australian Body designer at Ford Australia designed the “coupe utility” — the precursor to today’s full cab pickups by marrying the front of a car body to the rear of a pickup body. The result was successful worldwide and because they were designed for work, American banks didn’t hesitate to loan farmers money to buy them. Sales skyrocketed and the modern pickup became a staple of growing America.

While pickups were prevalent all over the country, Texans became particularly fond of them. Calling them “rancheros” because of their importance to Texas horse ranches, the state is sometimes referred to as “the land of pickup trucks.” And rightfully so. The state of Texas actually offers a lower tax on pickup registration than it does on any other vehicle.

Portrayed as a rough and rugged symbol of the ultra-masculine American man, pickups began to make appearances in Hollywood movies from neo-Westerns to the preferred vehicle of tough guys like Clint Eastwood in “Every Which Way But Loose,” and John Travolta in “Urban Cowboy.” And when a symbol of America emerges, politics are right behind, ready to exploit it. In a campaign speech, presidential nominee hopeful Fred Thompson even described his opponent’s faults by saying, “He hasn’t spent enough time in a pickup truck,” suggesting his opponent had trouble connecting with the “real” America. Even President George W. Bush – a proud Texan – has been observed driving around his ranch in a pickup.

Pickup trucks are no less popular today. Car companies find that while car sales in the U.S. are less stable, the pickup truck holds its own. Even companies like Isuzu now offer only high-performance pickup trucks (two models – the i-290 and i-370) and a single SUV model. Although people tend to love their SUVs and their flashy sports cars, pickup trucks continue to hold on as one of the best selling American vehicles. And from what we surmise, apple pie isn’t going anywhere either.

About the Author: Looking for a new SUV? Isuzu has you covered with the all new 2008 line-up. Get an SUV price quote right online. Takes just a few minutes!

Source: isnare.com

Permanent Link: isnare.com/?aid=190046&ca=Automotive

Category:April 23, 2010

? April 22, 2010
April 24, 2010 ?
April 23

Pages in category “April 23, 2010”

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Category:April_23,_2010&oldid=3056798”
Posted in Uncategorized

Looted, possibly contaminated body parts transplanted into USA, Canadian patients

Monday, March 20, 2006

Fears of contaminated bone and skin grafts are being felt by unsuspecting patients following the revelation that funeral homes may have been looting corpses.

Janet Evans of Marion, Ohio was told by her surgeon, “The bone grafts you got might have been contaminated”. She reacted with shock, “I was flabbergasted because I didn’t even know what he was talking about. I didn’t know I got a bone graft until I got this call. I just thought they put in screws and rods.”

The body of Alistair Cooke, the former host of Masterpiece Theatre, was supposedly looted along with more than 1,000 others, according to two law enforcement officials close to the case. The tissue taken was typically skin, bone and tendon, which was then sold for use in procedures such as dental implants and hip replacements. According to authorities, millions of dollars were made by selling the body parts to companies for use in operations done at hospitals and clinics in the United States and Canada.

A New Jersey company, Biomedical Tissue Services, has reportedly been taking body parts from funeral homes across Brooklyn, New York. According to ABC News, they set up rooms like a “surgical suite.” After they took the bones, they replaced them with PVC pipe. This was purportedly done by stealth, without approval of the deceased person or the next of kin. 1,077 bodies were involved, say prosecutors.

Investagators say a former dentist, Michael Mastromarino, is behind the operation. Biomedical was considered one of the “hottest procurement companies in the country,” raking in close to $5 million. Eventually, people became worried: “Can the donors be trusted?” A tissue processing company called LifeCell answered no, and issued a recall on all their tissue.

Cooke’s daughter, Susan Cooke Kittredge, said, “To know his bones were sold was one thing, but to see him standing truncated before me is another entirely.” Now thousands of people around the country are receiving letters warning that they should be tested for infectious diseases like HIV or hepatitis. On February 23, the Brooklyn District Attorney indicted Mastromarino and three others. They are charged with 122 felony counts, including forgery and bodysnatching.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Looted,_possibly_contaminated_body_parts_transplanted_into_USA,_Canadian_patients&oldid=4673663”
Posted in Uncategorized

Standard Deviation An Essential Tool For Forex Trading Success

Standard Deviation – An Essential Tool For Forex Trading Success

by

sacha Tarkovsky

Standard deviation is a concept all fore traders should understand, as it will give you a greater edge in your quest for forex trading success.

If you want to understand it read on and find out how it can make you a more profitable forex trader.

Standard deviation is logical and will help you time entries better and define targets for trades.

What is standard deviation?

Standard deviation is a statistical term that shows the volatility of price in any instrument including forex.

Standard deviation measures how widely values (closing prices) are dispersed from the average.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fl1i9snXRTU[/youtube]

Dispersion is defined as:

The difference between the actual value closing price and the average value or mean closing price.

The larger the difference between the closing prices and the average price, the higher the standard deviation and volatility of the currency measured will be.

The closer the closing prices are to the average mean price, the lower the standard deviation or volatility of the currency.

The confusing bit (don t worry we will simplify it later) but here is the definition:

Standard deviation is calculated by taking the square root of the variance, the average of the squared deviations from the mean.

High Standard Deviation is present when the price of the currency studied is changing dramatically.

Conversely, low Standard Deviation values occur when prices are more stable or less volatile.

Spotting Contrary trades

Major tops and bottoms are accompanied by high volatility as prices reflect the psychology of the participants.

Greed and fear, push prices away from the average to unsustainable levels and prices eventually return to the mean average.

Why is standard deviation such an essential study?

Any currency moves with the following inputs determining the price:

Supply and demand fundamentals + investor psychology = Price.

Taking Advantage Of Human Psychology

A big rise in volatility and a dramatic move away from the mean average, means that emotions are moving the currency too quickly away from the mean.

MORE FREE TRADING INFO PDF S & COURSES On all aspects of becoming a profitable trader including articles, feature, downloads and systems and an exclusive

Gann Trading Course

visit our website at

net-planet.org/index.html

Article Source:

ArticleRich.com

Final launch of Space Shuttle Discovery delayed until at least Thursday

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Space Shuttle Discovery’s final launch on the STS-133 mission to the International Space Station has been delayed at least an additional day. Launch is now targeted for 3:29 PM EDT on Thursday.

The launch was originally scheduled for this past Monday, but was delayed two days because of helium and nitrogen leaks on board the shuttle.

Technicians are now working to repair technical glitches discovered yesterday on a main engine control computer.

The weather outlook, however, appears to be unfavorable for the new targeted launch day; there is an 80 percent chance of undesirable weather, according to the NASA space shuttle weather officer Kathy Winters.

The mission management team (MMT) is meeting today to discuss and troubleshoot Discovery’s newfound electrical problems.

STS-133 is scheduled to be an 11-day mission to the International Space Station to ship supplies to the crew, as well as additional components for the orbital outpost’s construction, including the Permanent Multipurpose Module and the third of four ExPRESS Logistics Carriers. The mission is the 133rd of the Space Shuttle Program and the 39th of Discovery.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Final_launch_of_Space_Shuttle_Discovery_delayed_until_at_least_Thursday&oldid=4409772”
Posted in Uncategorized

Wikinews interviews Australian Paralympic skier Andrew Bor

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Sunday, Wikinews sat down with Australian Paralympic guide skier Andrew Bor who was participating in a national team training camp in Vail, Colorado.

((Wikinews)) This is Andrew Bor, who is Melissa Perrine’s guide skier. How did you become a guide?

Andrew Bor: I was coaching with the team, the September before the games here. And the APC [Australian Paralympic Committee] found out, I’m not sure how, sent Melissa out to New Zealand where there was a training camp. She didn’t have a guide. And one of the coaches chose me to guide Mel.

((WN)) Had you done much guiding before?

Andrew Bor: Two days. Guided a visually impaired athlete twice before that.

((WN)) Was there a steep learning curve?

Andrew Bor: Yeah, very steep learning curve. Still learning.

((WN)) Is it more difficult as a male guide with a female skier, do you think, because the rules require you to use male ski equipment?

Andrew Bor: No. No, I don’t think so. I don’t think there’s any issue with that. The skis make a different radius turn. Sometimes. No, I don’t think it makes a huge difference.

((WN)) As a guide skier, do you think that guides should be getting medals when their skier gets a medal? Are you that important?

Andrew Bor: No, I don’t know. It’s the athlete’s performance really.

((WN)) But you’re an athlete aren’t you?

Andrew Bor: No. I’m their eyes if that makes any sense. If they don’t have the commitment to go down the hill, you’re never going to get them to go fast anyway. The guide’s responsibility is to put them in the right place. But beyond that…

((WN)) You’ve gotten support because of the performance in Vancouver? The government has been supporting you guys?

Andrew Bor: The government has decided to support the guides as equally as the athletes. Before I was employed by the APC, and now I don’t get paid by the APC, I get the same support levels. Otherwise, you can’t do it, you can’t afford the time.

((WN)) Why have you chosen skiing as opposed to oh, waterskiing or some other sport?

Andrew Bor: I’ve worked in this industry for about 20 years. Teaching skiing, coaching. It’s not something I chose to do, it’s something that kind of happened. After a while a door closed, a door opened. I enjoy the environment. Working outdoors and work in some lovely places. You get some great days when there’s blue sky and sunshine and other days in Australia where it might be two degrees and raining. But it beats working in an office.

((WN)) Do you think the classification system for blind skiers works and is a good one? Especially with the factoring issues, and you’re competing with B1, B2, B3, all compete against each other.

Andrew Bor: Yeah, I don’t know. I don’t think there’s a big enough pool of athletes to have three different classes. It’s never going to be ideal. Different classes have different issues. The handicap for the twos and the threes is fairly similar across the different disciplines. Maybe the threes have an advantage in the tech because they can see a bit more, but they have a bit of a disadvantage in the speed because they can’t see enough to see the next gate and have to rely on the guide. Bit of a trade off. It’s never going to be perfect. It’s a tough one.

((WN)) Are you planning to go to Sochi with Melissa?

Andrew Bor: Yes. Yes I am.

((WN)) Do you think you guys have, you and Melissa can pick up a medal, and you get a medal?

Andrew Bor: I think Melissa is yeah. I think Melissa has a fairly good chance. You know, if things fall in place. I think she’s got an opportunity to win at least a medal. If things don’t fall in place. Yeah. She might miss out completely.

((WN)) Do you plan to continue guide skiing with Melissa for a period following Sochi, or are you going to be like “I’ve had enough, I’m getting old, these mountains are really tall, I’m going to retire?”

Andrew Bor: I don’t know. We’ll wait and see. At the moment the commitment is until Sochi. You see with athletes, some announce their retirement early. Depends what Melissa wants to do. Depends on whether you achieve the goals that she sets or not. Whether she’s got unfinished business…

((WN)) But at the moment, the goal is Sochi?

Andrew Bor: The goal is Sochi, yes. You’ve got to have an end goal, and at the moment it’s Sochi. The energy of the last four years has been put into that. There’s been a commitment for her to go to Sochi, and at the same time you’ve got to commit to the same thing. The guide-to-athlete thing is a relationship that takes time to build and work out the needs of the athlete and the wants of the athlete. Beyond Sochi, don’t know. We’ll see.
Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Wikinews_interviews_Australian_Paralympic_skier_Andrew_Bor&oldid=4567567”
Posted in Uncategorized

Time magazine refutes US President Donald Trump’s Twitter claim he was nominated Time ‘Person of the Year’

Monday, November 27, 2017

On Friday, US president Donald Trump released a tweet via Twitter claiming New York-based magazine Time had informed him they would “probably” name him “Person of the Year”. The claims made in the tweet, sent while Trump resided for the Thanksgiving season at his Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, were promptly refuted by the magazine itself and personnel connected to its publication.

Trump’s tweet read, “Time Magazine called to say that I was PROBABLY going to be named ‘Man (Person) of the Year,’ like last year, but I would have to agree to an interview and a major photo shoot. I said probably is no good and took a pass. Thanks anyway!”

Time magazine recognizes as “Person of the Year” an individual who “for better or for worse… has done the most to influence the events of the year.” The magazine named Trump in 2016 in an issue titled “President of the Divided States of America” a month after his successful bid for the U.S. presidency. Agence France-Presse noted, in 2012, 2013, and 2015 Trump used his Twitter account as a platform to highlight his displeasure at not being so named.

Time magazine released a tweet of their own on Friday refuting the claim made by Trump, which read, “The President is incorrect about how we choose Person of the Year. TIME does not comment on our choice until publication, which is December 6.”

Rather than a photo shoot such as Trump claimed they requested, Time magazine used a painting to depict German chancellor Angela Merkel for their 2015 “Person of the Year” issue, when they chose her to receive the title.

Alan Murray, the chief content officer for Time Inc., the magazine’s publisher, also countered Trump’s claim in a tweet on Friday, stating, “Amazing. Not a speck of truth here—Trump tweets he ‘took a pass’ at being named TIME’s person of the year”.

Richard Stengel, a former editor of the magazine, also weighed in on Trump’s comments in a tweet posted half an hour after Trump’s, “Hate to tell you but that PROBABLY means you’re NOT Person of the Year. They just wanted a photo shoot. But I’m sure you still have that fake TIME cover somewhere in storage.” Stengel’s tweet refers to fake Time magazine covers prominently displaying Trump’s face that were hung on the walls of golf clubs owned by the President, as reported in the Washington Post in June. The magazine requested their removal.

Since Trump entered the race for U.S. president, he has frequently called news outlets in the United States “fake news” when they release reports critical of him.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Time_magazine_refutes_US_President_Donald_Trump%27s_Twitter_claim_he_was_nominated_Time_%27Person_of_the_Year%27&oldid=4572680”
Posted in Uncategorized

Qantas ordered to check oxygen cylinders

Sunday, July 27, 2008

Australian Transport Safety Bureau announced that an oxygen cylinder which was located near the area of the explosion on Qantas flight QF30 from London, England to Melbourne, Australia was unaccounted for but said that it was too early to say that an oxygen cylinder could be the cause of the mid-air explosion. It did say it had ruled out explosives as a cause stating that they “found no indication of explosives”.

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority has ordered Qantas to check all oxygen cylinders and the brackets which hold them on its Boeing 747s, but hasn’t ruled out that the order will be extended to all of the Qantas fleet.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Qantas_ordered_to_check_oxygen_cylinders&oldid=4567649”
Posted in Uncategorized

Sam Simon, ‘The Simpsons’ co-creator, dies aged 59

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Sam Simon died, at the age of 59, on Sunday of colon cancer, a disease he was diagnosed with in 2012. One of the co-creators of the television series The Simpsons, Simon helped create the hugely successful series in 1989 alongside Matt Groening and James L. Brooks. He left the show in 1993 after roles as writer and character developer among others.

Before The Simpsons Simon had worked on several shows in various positions. During the 1980s he worked on shows such as Taxi, Cheers, and The Tracy Ullman Show. In 1989 he helped create The Simpsons with Brooks and Groening, and was responsible for hiring the show’s first writing team. Despite leaving the show in 1993 he kept the title of executive producer, and continued to receive tens of millions of dollars every season in royalties.

After his diagnosis he began to donate his fortune to charity, estimated at around US$100 million . He donated to and was an active voice for charities focusing on animal rights including PETA. The Sam Simon Foundation, an organization he founded in 2002, released a statement to TMZ after his death: “For those of us who knew him, his voice will forever echo in our minds; his sense of humor will continue to make us laugh; and his compassion and generosity will continue to impact our lives[…] Sam, you will be missed by many, but there is a particular sadness among our clinic staff. We have been together for so long, and your absence will forever leave a void in our lives.”

Speaking to NBC in November 2014, Simon said “Cancer has been a fight, a journey, an adventure and the most amazing experience of my life.”

Simon had no children and was twice divorced. His first wife was actress Jennifer Tilly, to whom he was married from 1984 until their split in 1991. He married Playboy Playmate Jami Ferrell in 2000; the pair divorced not long after.

Current executive producer of The Simpsons, Al Jean paid tribute to Simon via Twitter, tweeting “Just heard terrible news of death of @simonsam. A great man; I owe him everything.”

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Sam_Simon,_%27The_Simpsons%27_co-creator,_dies_aged_59&oldid=4272580”
Posted in Uncategorized

How Much Of The Bible Can A Person Not Believe And Still Be Okay?

Assuming there is a problem between man and God, what is the stuff that corrects the problem? Is it good works? Is it obedience to various rituals? Is it by confessing and repenting of sins?We maintain that a man is justified (made right with God) by faith … Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness (Ro 3:28 and 4:3). So, what did Abraham believe? He simply believed what (God) had promised, He was also able to perform (Ro 4:21) – even though Gods declaration defied natural law … as Sarahs womb was long dead (Gen 18:9-15 and Ro 4:19). Now, not for his sake only was it written, that (righteousness) was credited to him, but for our sake also, to whom it will be reckoned, as those who believe in Him … (Ro 4:21, 23-24). So, what must one believe so as to gain right standing before the Creator? This is quite simple. One must believe His words. While the Bible is not God (any more than our words are us), these words come from within Him and, as such, are an extension of Him. That is why unbelief repels Him. Thou hast magnified Thy word together with all Thy Name (Ps 138:2). It is easier for the heavens and earth to vanish than for a single stroke of His word to fail (Mt 5:18). Forever, O Lord, Thy word stands in heaven (Ps 119:89). The Horseman (Jesus) in Revelation is called, The Word of God (Rev 19:13). But, … this is just the beginning.God has decided to use His Word to bring us to Himself. In the exercise of His will He brought us forth by the word of truth … (Ja 1:18). (F)or you have been born again … through the living and abiding word of God (1Pet 1:23). He cleanses us by washing us with the word (Eph 5:26). It is also the tool for Christian growth. (L)ong for the pure milk of the word, in order that you may grow … (1Pet 2:2). Eventually, it is solid food … for the mature (Heb 5:13,14). Gods word is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness (2Cor 3:16). It is living and active – and is compared to a sword, a hammer and fire (Heb 4:12 and Jer 23:29). So, how much of it can one not believe – and still be okay?Our relationship to His Word determines our eternal fate.Jesus once said, whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will also be ashamed of him when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels (Mk 8:38). But, why any shame? If I believe the Bible is from our eternal Creator – who is incapable of error and never lies – whats the problem? I did not write any of it. This Book was completed almost two thousand years ago. If I decide to represent it – my job is to faithfully and accurately share its contents to interested parties. What parts could possibly make me red-faced before an adulterous and sinful generation? Well, lets start at the beginning of the Book. Is there anything there that might cause me shame?The first three chapters of Genesis detail Creation … and then the Fall. God spoke the heavens and earth into existence (initially from nothing) in six days. Then a Garden is described with the first man (naked), the first woman (naked), and a talking animal. Then a singular event of disobedience is recounted which is declared the genesis of all our troubles – troubles like pain, a harsh environment – you know, the bumps and potholes on lifes road. And this road proceeds to a cliff … over which we all plummet into death. No belief problems yet, right?Jesus and Paul referred to events in that Garden as they make arguments for marriage, divorce, death, sin, the current physical environment, and the role of women (Mt 19:4-12, Ro 5:12-19, 8:20-23, 1Tim 2:9-15). If the Creation/Fall account is symbolic, a myth, or folklore, then their points crumble. Jesus and Paul believed the Genesis account to be … historical.So, why do Systematic Theologians call belief in the historical accuracy of this account, The Naive-Literal View? Why not just, The Literal View? And from whence cometh the Age-Day theory, Progressive Creation theory, and Pictorial Day theory? Why these systems of unbelief toward historical information? Could it be … some are ashamed of a literal adherence to it? Granted, this account does defy natural law, but, come to think of it … Abrahams faith required belief against natural law, too.So, the question remains, how much of the word of God can one not believe … and still be okay? If one is red-faced over the Creation/Fall account – particularly before scientific experts of the various longevity models – well, what about other things? The Bible declares that forty days after rising from the dead, Jesus physically lifted off the ground and went into Heaven. So, … do you believe this nature defying account – but not Genesis? What about Elijah being taken up by a chariot of fire? What about Elisha and the floating iron axe head? What about the sun standing still so Joshua could kill more people? Hundreds of Biblical accounts defy natural law. Do you believe them? Or, do you believe some of them – while being red-faced about others? Here is one way to test yourself, to see if you are in the faith (2Cor 13:5). Go find a scientifically informed, atheistic evolutionist and tell him/her which miraculous Biblical accounts you do believe … and why. As they begin a belly laugh, and fall to the ground in hysterics – what do you feel inside yourself? Embarrassment? Shame?The question remains: How much can one … well, you know the rest of the question.A Couple of PointsFirst, … for any given Biblical declaration, people line up as either a believer or unbeliever. But, it is also clear that God ultimately classifies some as unbelievers – who actually do believe some of the Bible. You believe that God is one. You do well; the demons also believe, and shudder (Ja 2:19). These people (and all the demons, too) believe accurately on this point … but, are not okay. Many will say to me on (Judgment) Day, Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name … (Mt 7:21-23). These people even believe Jesus is Lord – and that they had served Him in this life! But, they are not okay. So, even an accurate faith in some of Gods word does not result in righteousness being credited to those believers. So, how much can one not believe ….Second, … there was a time I … was an unbeliever. I wholeheartedly believed in evolution – even taking college courses. Quite honestly, all this Biblical material … was totally irrelevant (I detail much of this elsewhere). So, I know what it means – to not believe. How did this change? Well, once jogged awake, I began digging, digging, digging – weighing, weighing, weighing – and asking, asking, asking. Step by step, issue by issue, objection by objection, God eventually sold me on the validity and accuracy of His claims – despite current natural law. Even now, as I reflect back on this journey, I find it stunning. There was no compelling reason God had to come down to my level, dismantle my contrary beliefs, and then open my mind – so as to unashamedly embrace, and then advocate, His assertions. But, He did so anyway. To say I am indebted to Him does not begin to grasp the reality of my former plight – and rescue.Still, at times along the way, I have struggled with some Biblical declarations. I could not make myself believe them … and I could not pretend to believe them either. But, as unbelief is a mortal threat to my eternal well being, what could I do? Fortunately, God addresses this. After The Transfiguration, Jesus was confronted by a situation the disciples could not handle. A distraught father implored Him, … if You can do anything, take pity on us and help us! Jesus responded, If You can? All things are possible to him who believes. Immediately, the boys father cried out and began saying, I do believe; help me in my unbelief (Mk 9:22-24). This man humbled himself … and the Lord responded positively.I do not know how much one can not believe of the Word of God … and still be okay. But, I do know this; one stands, or falls, based upon ones belief, or unbelief, of it. Are you sure you want to stand before the Author and tell Him the Creation Account is a myth, that axe head never floated, no hand appeared and wrote on a wall ….